Implementation of Smart Co-Housing Concept in Middle-Aged Adult Community in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/ijobes.v1i2.360Abstract
ABSTRACT : The population of productive age will reach 70% in 2020-2030, while the remaining 30% is unproductive population (under 15 years and above 65 years). The increasing number of population will affect on increasing housing needs, whereas if viewed from the availability of land, it will be difficult to realize a private housing that will required land is large enough for each family. When faced with other phenomena, the productive age composition is filled by a year old aged of 35-60 years and dominated by a millennials generation. This generation is very open and accustomed to the use of technology in daily life. The proximity of millennial generation with technology will revolutionize the way of human life, especially how to settle to influence the growth of housing and urban in indonesia. Therefore, with regard to the problem of increasing housing needs due to the explosion of population in Indonesia, if faced with demands of technological demand as a lifestyle of millennials, the concept of ' smart co-housing ' which is the concept of a decent and integrated residential housing that can consist of several families. Smart co-housing contains two concepts of house concept, which are smart house and shared house. Smart house is a concept of houses that apply technology application and directed into the eco-friendly housing because there is control of energy consumption. Meanwhile, house sharing is a residential concept combining of multiple families with the sharing of private and public spaces as a communal spaces. This research uses a descriptive method that examines the concept of smart co-housing to make a description of the concept systematically later compared to similar phenomena that have occurred in other countries (comparative study) to determine the potential and challenge of the implications of this housing concept in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the smart co-housing concept can be applied in Indonesia as a solution of increasing housing needs for millennials in middle adulthood, in terms of economic, social, and environmental aspects.
Keywords : Demographic bonuses, co-housing, middle-aged adult, smart housing
References
Ananta, A. W. W. P. (2017). Hukum Bisnis Properti Indonesia. PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zsRGDwAAQBAJ
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2012). Analisis Statistik Sosial. Bonus Demografi dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi.
Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. (2013). Proyeksi Penduduk Indonesia 2010-2035. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. https://doi.org/2101018
Budi, K. (2018). Pemerintah Optimistis Satu Juta Rumah Terbangun Tahun Ini. Retrieved from https://properti.kompas.com/read/2018/04/04/171004921/pemerintah-optimistis-satu-juta-rumah-terbangun-tahun-ini
Buys, L. (2005). Smart Housing and Social Sustainability: Learning from the Residents of Queensland’s Research House, (June 2016).
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approached (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Damanik, J. (2016). Survei Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Rumah Tangga Di Wilayah Kerja BBPPKI Medan Tahun 2016 Survey Use Of Information And Communication Technology In The Household Work In Medan BBPPKI, 5(2), 93–108.
Direktur Permukiman dan Perumahan. (2015). Penyediaan Hunian Layak bagi Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah ( MBR ) dalam Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2015-2019. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://docplayer.info/35197164-Penyediaan-hunian-layak-bagi-masyarakat-berpenghasilan-rendah-mbr-dalam-rencana-pembangunan-jangka-menengah-nasional.html
Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the Triple Bottom Line, 1(1986), 1–16.
Geo. (2012). Arah Pendidikan Menghadapi Bonus Demografi. Retrieved from http://lihatbumi.blogspot.com/2012/11/bonus-demografi.html
Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Second, Vol. 53). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hanifah, Y., Reztrie, N. D., Ramadhan, T., & Larasati, D. (2019). Evaluation of Material Selection on the Initial Embodied Energy Value of Low-Middle Apartment in Indonesia Evaluation of Material Selection on the Initial Embodied Energy Value of Low-Middle Apartment in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/294/1/012036
Jahja, Y. (2012). Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta: Kencana. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5KRPDwAAQBAJ
Jati, W. R. (2015). Bonus Demografi Sebagai Mesin Pertumbuhan Ekonomi : Jendela Peluang Atau Jendela Bencana Di Indonesia ?, 23, 1–19.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. New Age International (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lojaya, I. (2019). Cohousing, Perumahan Berkonsep Komunitas (1). Retrieved from http://blog.arsitekonline.com/2010/02/rumah-cohousing-perumahan-berkonsep.html
McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (1989). Cohousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. Ten Speed Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=In0eAQAAIAAJ
Ngafifi, M. (2014). Kemajuan Teknologi Dan Pola Hidup Manusia Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v2i1.2616
Noor, A. R. (2016). Penentu Masa Depan Energi di Era Digital: Generasi Millennial. Retrieved from https://inet.detik.com/business/d-3288350/penentu-masa-depan-energi-di-era-digital-generasi-millennial
Pusat Litbang Permukiman. (2009). Kajian Pemanfaatan Ruang dan Infrastruktur Permukiman di Pulau-pulau Kecil. Bandung.
Ramadhan, T. (2017). Pemahaman Masyarakat Mengenai Dampak Pembangunan Hunian Terkait Global Warming dan Penerapan Green Building. In M. Iqbal, N. P. Lisa, E. Muliana, & C. A. Fithri (Eds.), Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI 2017 (p. G 035-42). Lhokseumawe.
Ramadhan, T., Larasati, D., Widaningsih, L., & Kusuma, H. E. (2019). Parameter of Green Concept Implementation in Residential Building : A Community Perspective, 2019, 847–861. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i21.5016
Ramadhan, T., Septian, L. H., & Nurdini, A. (2019). Housing Morphology and Connectivity Quality in Periphery of Bandung City : Space Syntax Analysis 1 . Housing in Periphery Bandung and Space Syntax Anal- ysis : Introduction, 2019, 470–484. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i21.4988
Rosa, Y. (2013). Rumusan Metode Perhitungan Backlog Rumah. Jurnal Permukiman, Vol. 8 No., 58–68.
Rosa, Y. (2014). Housing Careers In Indonesia , Bandung City As A Case Study. Jurnal Permukiman, Vol. 9 No., 158–168.
Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Energi Nasional. (2016). Outlook Energi Indonesia 2016. Jakarta: Dewan Energi Nasional.
Shahreza, M. (2017). Komunikator Politik Berdasarkan Teori Generasi Komunikator Politik Berdasarkan Teori Generasi, (December). https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v1i1.273
Steele, J. (1997). Sustainable Architecture: Principles, Paradigms, and Case Studies. McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UyIyQgAACAAJ
Stratmann, J., Ferreiro, L. W., & Narayan, R. (2013). Towards Sustainability – Analysis of Collaborative Behaviour in Urban Cohousing.
Whitney, F. L. (1946). The elements of research. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Retrieved from file://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002621729
Williams, D. J. (2005). Sun, surf and sustainable housing—cohousing, the Californian experience. International Planning Studies, 10(2), 145–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470500258824
Williams, J. (2008). Predicting an American future for cohousing. Futures, 40(3), 268–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.022
