Comparison of The Results of The Naïve Bayes Method and Synthetic Minority Over Sampling Technique in Sentiment Analysis of User Reviews
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/jesii.v2i1.3416Abstract
The rapid development of information technology encourages a variety of applications available on the Google Play Store. with various application categories, such as business, communication, education etc. One example of such an application is an online course application, namely Skill Academy from Ruangguru, which offers a variety of online guidance in the fields of education, self-development, and career. So from this, sentiment analysis will be carried out to understand a person's opinion and attitude towards a particular subject, theme, or entity in a text on the Skill Academy application from Ruangguru. This research aims to compare the performance of the Naı¨ve Bayes classification algorithm with the Syntetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) on the sentiment of the Skill Academy application. This study shows the results of calculations without SMOTE and compares them with the results of SMOTE calculations. The results of this study are also expected to provide a better understanding of analyzing dataset imbalance on sentiment analysis results using Naıve Bayes and SMOTE techniques. In addition, it can be used in conjunction with appropriate evaluation methods to produce a more accurate model.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ilham Satria Al Munawar, Erwin Teguh Arujisaputra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in JESII: Journal Elektronik Sistem InformasI agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





