DESAIN MUSEUM IN-SITU SEBAGAI MEDIA KONSERVASI SITUS ARKEOLOGI (Studi Kasus: Situs Arkeologi Gunung Padang Cianjur)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v5i1.581Keywords:
Desain Museum In-situ, Perlindungan Situs Arkeologi, Pariwisata Pusaka BudayaAbstract
Abstract: The Gunung Padang archaeological site in Cianjur, West Java is currently experiencing a challenge when this site is opened to the public where can also be researched and visited at once as one of the source economic benefits to local people. This paper discusses how the typology of the presentation model of archeological sites will become the basis of the concept of museum design as a solution for conservation and the continuity of the research on the Gunung Padang site. The discussion includes; (1) investigating site characteristics and sense of place by providing information about archeological relations with the architectural context; (2) choosing a site presentation typology model that links contemporary characters, historical functions, and future planning and management; (3) analyze planning factors such as location, context, and use; (4) synergizing the previous stages of site design as a combination of space and place of landscape in the archeological order. The result is the museum design as an educational tourist spot with a main orientation on conservation and archaeological research on the Gunung Padang site.
Abstrak: Situs arkeologi Gunung Padang di Cianjur, Jawa Barat saat ini mengalami tantangan ketika situs ini dibuka untuk umum di mana harus dapat diteliti dan dikunjungi sekaligus sebagai sumber keuntungan ekonomi untuk masyarakat sekitar. Makalah ini membahas bagaimana tipologi model penyajian situs arkeologi akan menjadi dasar konsep desain museum sebagai solusi untuk konservasi dan kelanjutan penelitian di situs Gunung Padang. Diskusi meliputi; (1) menyelidiki karakteristik situs dan sense of place dengan memberikan informasi tentang hubungan arkeologis dengan konteks arsitektur; (2) memilih model tipologi presentasi situs yang menghubungkan karakter kontemporer, fungsi historis, dan perencanaan dan manajemen masa depan; (3) menganalisis faktor-faktor perencanaan seperti lokasi, konteks, dan penggunaan; (4) mensinergikan tahap-tahap desain situs sebelumnya sebagai kombinasi ruang dan tempat lanskap dalam tatanan arkeologis. Hasil penelitian adalah desain museum sebagai tempat wisata pendidikan dengan orientasi utama pada konservasi dan penelitian arkeologi di situs Gunung Padang.
References
Akbar, A., (2013), Situs Gunung Padang, misteri dan arkeologi. Jakarta: Change Publication.
Yondri, L., (2017), Situs Gunung Padang; kebudayaan, manusia, dan lingkungan. Bandung: CV Semiotika.
Rotea, R.B., Borrazas, P.M., Vila, X.M., (2003), Archaeology of Architecture: theory, methodology and analysis from Landscape Archaeology. Pada Vila, X.M., Rotea, R.B., Borrazas, P.M (Eds). Archaeotecture: Archaeology of Architecture, (pp 17-40), Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
Vila, X.M., Rotea, R.B., Borrazas, P.M., (2003), Archaeotecture: seeking a new archaeological vision of Architecture. Pada Vila, X.M., Rotea, R. B., Borrazas, P. M (Eds). Archaeotecture: Archaeology of Architecture, (pp 1-16), Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
Bayer, H., (1961), Aspects of Design of Exhibitions and Museums, Curator: The Museum Journal, 4(3), 257-288Bronto, S dan Langi, B.S. 2016. Geologi Gunung Padang dan sekitarnya Kabupaten Cianjur. Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral. Vol 17(1) hal: 37- 49.
Marotta, A., (2012), Typology: Museums. Diunduh pada tanggal 15 Juli 2018, dari https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/typology/typology-museums/8640202.article
Osman, K.A., Farahat, B.I., (2014), Museums Between Tradition and Modernism: Memorial Museum Like Jewish Museum in Berlin as a Case Study. Journal of Engineering Sciences Assiut University, 43(5), 1294-1316.
Sutarman, Hermawan E.H., Hilman, C., (2016), Gunung Padang Cianjur: Pelestarian Situs Megalitikum Terbesar Warisan Dunia. Jurnal Surya: Seri Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 57-64.
Wise, C., Erdues, A., (1975), Museum Architecture, Museum, XXVI (3/4). Paris: UNESCO.
International Council of Museums, (2017), ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums. Paris: ICOM UNESCO.
Mosler, A.S., (2006), Landscape Architecture on Archaeological Sites: establishing landscape design principles for archaeological sites by means of examples from West Anatolia, Turkey, Muenchen: Faculty of Architecture Technical University of Munich.
Robillard, D.A., (1982), Public Space Design in Museums, Milwaukee: Center for Architecture and Urban Planning Research University of Wisconsin.
Yondri, L., Mundardjito, Permana, C. E., (2012), Laporan Hasil Penelitian Arkeologi Situs Megalitik Gunung Padang. Jakarta: Balai Arkeologi Nasional.
Avrami, E., Mason, R., (2002, May 2000), Heritage Values and Challenges of Conservation Planning. Makalah disajikan pada Management planning for archaeological sites: an international workshop, Corinth, Greece.
Demas, M., (2002, May 2000), Planning for Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites: A Value-Based Approach. Makalah disajikan pada Management planning for archaeological sites: an international workshop, Corinth, Greece.
Ioannidis, Ch., Xipnitou, M., Potsitou, C., Soile, S. (2003), The Contribution of Modern Geometric Recording and Visualization Methods in the Implementation of a New Museum Concept. IAPRS (vol. XXXIV-5/C15), Proceedings of International Symposium of CIPA, 419-424.
Matero, F., (2006, June), Making Archaeological Sites: Conservation as Interpretation of an Excavated Past. Makalah disajikan pada The 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington D.C., USA.
Palumbo, G., (2002, May 2000), Threats and Challenges to the Archaeological Heritage in Mediterranean. Makalah disajikan pada Management planning for archaeological sites: an international workshop, Corinth, Greece.
Tzortzi, K., (2015, July), Spatial Concepts in Museum Theory and Practice. Makalah disajikan pada 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, England.
