SUSTAINABLE IMPACT CONSIDERATION IN COMPARISON GREEN BUILDING RATING TOOLS IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Ghina Mardhiyana Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Dewi Larasati Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Sarah Nadia Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Fajar Triadi Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v7i3.3204

Keywords:

Bangunan Gedung Hijau (BGH), green building, Greenship, rating tools, sustainability

Abstract

Abstract: Binjai City is a level II city area with the status of.a municipality within the province of North Sumatra, Indonesia. Binjai is located about 22 Km west of the provincial capital of North Sumatra. Binjai City is divided into 5 districts, namely Kota Binjai, North Binjai, South Binjai, West Binjai, East Binjai. Binjai is one of the cities that has a large rice field area. Binjai City is also one of the tourist cities that is currently very often visited by many people. This study aims to landscape development to analyze the development of potential landscapes in rice fields as a means of developing tourist attractions in binjai city. Based on the questioner research 73% respondent strongly agreed and 27% agreed to lanctioning rice fields as tourism object.The results of this activity are in the form of design designs for educational areas about planting rice fields, outbound, relaxing areas, playgrounds, and supporting facilities. The excavation of information from the villagers was also welcomed and added to the enthusiasm of the residents to make East Binjai a tourist village. The results of the Park Tourism design can help for development even though it is carried out in stages.

Keyword: Agrotourism, Binjai City, Landscape

Abstrak: Kota Binjai merupakan kawasan kota tingkat II yang berstatus kotamadya di dalam provinsi Sumatera Utara, Indonesia. Binjai terletak sekitar 22 Km sebelah barat ibu kota provinsi Sumatera Utara. Kota Binjai terbagi menjadi 5 kabupaten yaitu Kota Binjai, Binjai Utara, Binjai Selatan, Binjai Barat, Binjai Timur. Binjai merupakan salah satu kota yang memiliki areal persawahan yang luas. Kota Binjai juga merupakan salah satu kota wisata yang saat ini sangat sering dikunjungi banyak orang. Penelitian ini bertujuan pengembangan lanskap untuk menganalisis pengembangan potensi lanskap di persawahan sebagai sarana pengembangan daya tarik wisata di kota binjai. Berdasarkan penelitian kuesioner 73% responden sangat setuju dan 27% setuju untuk menjadikan sawah lanctioning sebagai objek wisata.Hasil dari kegiatan ini berupa desain desain untuk area edukasi tentang penanaman sawah, outbond, area santai, taman bermain, dan fasilitas penunjang. Penggalian informasi dari warga juga disambut baik dan menambah semangat warga untuk menjadikan Binjai Timur sebagai desa wisata. Hasil rancangan Taman Wisata dapat membantu untuk pengembangan meskipun dilakukan secara bertahap.

Kata Kunci : Agrowisata, Kota Binjai, Lanskap

References

Abbaszadeh, S., Zagreus, L., Lehrer, D., & Huizenga, C. (2006). Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, 3, 365–370. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9rf7p4bs

Abduh, M., & Fauzi, R. T. (2012). Kajian sistem assessment proses konstruksi pada greenship rating tool. KoNTekS 6, November 2012, 111–119. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33171803 1_Kajian_Sistem_Assessment_Proses_Konstruksi

_pada_Greenship_Rating_Tool

Akcay, E. C., & Arditi, D. (2017). Desired points at minimum cost in the "optimize energy performance" credit of LEED certification. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(6), 796–805. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1319412

Al-Surf, M., Balabel, A., Alwetaishi, M., Abdelhafiz, A., Issa, U., Sharaky, I., Shamseldin, A., & Al-Harthi, M. (2021). Stakeholder's perspective on green building rating systems in Saudi Arabia: the case of LEED, Mostadam, and the SDGs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158463

Amiri, A., Ottelin, J., Sorvari, J., & Junnila, S. (2020). Economic and technical considerations in pursuing green building certification: a case study from Iran. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020719

Azhar, S., Carlton, W. A., Olsen, D., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED® rating analysis. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.019

Bele, S., & Gogate, N. G. (2019). Blending & shortlisting indicators from existing sustainability rating systems in the Indian context. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 5163–5167. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3161.078219

Beltrán-Méndez, O., & Nik-Bakht, M. (2018). Can "EDGE" be the solution to the sustainability of buildings in the Colombian market? Construction Research Congress 2018, 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481301.025

Building and Construction Authority (BCA). (2016). Green Mark for Non-Residential Building NRB:2015 (R3 ed.). Building and Construction Authority. https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs- corp-

buildsg/sustainability/green_mark_nrb_2015_criteri a.pdf

Carvalho, J. P., Bragança, L., & Mateus, R. (2020). A systematic review of the role of BIM in building sustainability assessment methods. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(13), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134444

Castro, M. de F., Mateus, R., & Bragança, L. (2014). A critical analysis of building sustainability assessment methods for healthcare buildings. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(6), 1381–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9611-0

Daoud, A. O., Othman, A. A. E., Ebohon, O. J., & Bayyati,

A. (2020). Overcoming the limitations of the green pyramid rating system in the Egyptian construction industry: a critical analysis. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1802218

Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction - the role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025

Doan, D. T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Zhang, T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Tookey, J. (2017). A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007

EDGE Buildings. (2022). Project Studies. EDGE Buildings. https://edgebuildings.com/project-studies/

Freitas, I. A. S., & Zhang, X. (2018). Green building rating systems in Swedish market - A comparative analysis between LEED, BREEAM SE, GreenBuilding and Miljöbyggnad. Energy Procedia, 153, 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.066

GBCI. (2013). Perangkat penilaian GREENSHIP (Greenship rating tools). Green Building Council Indonesia. https://www.gbcindonesia.org/files/resource/9b552 832-b500-4b73-8c0e-acfaa1434731/Summary GREENSHIP New Building V1.2.pdf

GBCI. (2022). About EDGE.

https://edgebuildings.com/about/about-edge/

Geng, Y., Ji, W., Wang, Z., Lin, B., & Zhu, Y. (2019). A

review of operating performance in green buildings: energy use, indoor environmental quality, and occupant satisfaction. Energy and Buildings, 183, 500–514.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017

Green Building Council Indonesia. (2020). Certified Buildings. GBCI.

https://www.gbcindonesia.org/certbuilding

Guz, A. N., & Rushchitsky, J. J. (2009). Scopus: a system for the evaluation of scientific journals. International Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4

Hatmoko, J. U. D., Sucipto, T. L. A., Prasetyo, S. C. A., & Setiawati, A. (2017). Towards green building implementation in Indonesia: lessons learned from Singapore. Advanced Science Letters, 23(3), 2548–

https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8695 Illankoon, I. M. C. S., Tam, V. W. Y., Le, K. N., & Shen, L.

(2017). Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 209–220.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.206 International Finance Corporation. (2020). EDGE User

Guide.

Kapoor, P., Saberi, O., & Oliver, N. (2019). Green urban development: a methodology to calculate site and infrastructure-related GHG emissions. IOP

Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 297(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/297/1/012004

Kementerian PUPR. (2020). Sistem rating bangunan gedung hijau (2nd ed.). Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Lampiran Permen PUPR No 21 Tahun 2021 tentang BGH, Pub. L. No. 21, 1 (2021).

Liu, Y., Wu, X., Ten, J., Zou, S., & Zhou, J. (2019).

Research on green project certification in China based on LEED and GBES. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 233(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/233/5/052036

Lohmeng, A., Sudasna, K., & Tondee, T. (2017). State of the art of green building standards and certification system development in Thailand. Energy Procedia, 138, 417–422.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.188

Nag, P. K. (2019). Green Building and Assessment Systems. In Office Buildings, Design Science and Innovation (pp. 435–475). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2577-9_15

Neuman, W. L., Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Teaching Sociology (Vol. 30, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488

Nguyen, H. D., Do, Q. N. H., & Macchion, L. (2023). Influence of Practitioners' Characteristics on risk assessment in Green Building Projects in emerging economies: a case of Vietnam. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(2), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-

Pamungkas, A. R., Sucipto, T. L. A., Murtiono, E. S., & Farkhan, A. (2018). Kajian implementasi green building konservasi air rumah sakit UNS berdasarkan sistem sertifikasi EDGE (Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies). Indonesian Journal Of Civil Engineering Education, 4(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijcee.v4i2.27774

Park, J. Y., Choi, S. G., Kim, D. K., Jeong, M. C., & Kong,

J. S. (2017). Credit optimization algorithm for calculating LEED costs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091607

The Green Building Information Gateway (GBIG). (2022).

Indonesia. http://www.gbig.org/places/545

United Nations Environment Program. (2021). 2021 Global status report for buildings and construction: towards a zero-emissions, efficient, resilient building and construction sector.

https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/2021- 10/GABC_Buildings-GSR-2021_BOOK.pdf

USGBC. (2021). LEED v4.1 building design and construction. https://build.usgbc.org/ID+C_Guide

USGBC. (2022). LEED Project Profiles. U.S. Green Building Council. https://www.usgbc.org/projects

Vierra, S. (2018). Green Building Standards and Certification System. BDG - Whole Building Design Guide. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/green- building-standards-and-certification-systems

Wen, B., Musa, N., Onn, C. C., Ramesh, S., Liang, L., & Wang, W. (2020). Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120912.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120912

Yau, Y. (2012). Willingness To Pay and Preferences.

Journal of Green Building, 7(2), 137–152.

Zimmermann, R. K., Skjelmose, O., Jensen, K. G., Jensen,

K. K., & Birgisdottir, H. (2019). Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of

Sustainable Building. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060

Downloads

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

Mardhiyana, G., Larasati, D., Nadia, S., & Triadi, F. (2023). SUSTAINABLE IMPACT CONSIDERATION IN COMPARISON GREEN BUILDING RATING TOOLS IN INDONESIA. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, 7(3), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v7i3.3204