HUBUNGAN PLACE IDENTITY DENGAN IDENTITY OF COMMUNITY PADA CO-WORKING SPACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v7i3.3184Keywords:
Co-working space, Identity of Community, Place IdentityAbstract
Abstract: The continuous development of technology pursues the emergence of co-working, mainly in Surabaya with many enthusiasts, especially startups. Place identity is represented by Koridor Co-working Space. While identity of community by startups is dominated by Z and millennial. It is said that place and user can influence each other. In its application, co-working can accommodate many startups in one location. Co-working needs to express place identity and identity of community as user. Meanwhile startups, in their effort to express identity of community, need more space control. Only a little research has discussed place identity and identity of community that are specific to co-working. Thus this correlational research aims to identify the relationship of place identity and identity of community in co-working. Through post-positivism paradigm and the collected data through observation, documentation, archive and likert-scale questionnaire, data from 67 respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. The results show that most startup members consider place identity of Koridor Co-working Space to be unique and very unique. From all aspects identity of community and place identity, two pairs of interconnected were found; education with shape and form of building and income with materials. Thus in this position, the hypothesis can be accepted.
Keyword: Co-working space, identity of community, place identity
Abstrak: Berkembangnya teknologi berkesinambungan dengan munculnya co-working space terutama di Kota Surabaya dengan banyak peminat, yaitu kelompok startup. Place identity diwakili oleh Koridor Co-working Space. Sementara identity of community diwakili oleh kelompok startup yang didominasi generasi Z dan Y. Diketahui bahwa tempat dan pengguna saling berhubungan. Dalam aplikasinya, co-working space dapat menampung banyak startup dalam satu lokasi. Co-working space perlu memunculkan place identity sekaligus identity of community sebagai penggunanya. Sementara kelompok startup dalam upaya memunculkan identity of community terhalang oleh kendali ruang yang terbatas. Belum banyak penelitian yang membahas tentang konsep place identity dan identity of community yang spesifik pada objek co-working space. Dengan begitu, penelitian correlational research ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan place identity dengan identity of community pada co-working space. Melalui paradigma post-positivism dan teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi, dokumentasi, arsip dan kuesioner berskala likert, data dari 67 responden dianalisis menggunakan analisa statistik deskriptif. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas anggota startup menilai place identity Koridor Co-working Space tergolong unik dan sangat unik. Selain itu, dari seluruh sub-variabel identity of community dan place identity yang dihubungan, ditemukan dua pasang yang terbukti berhubungan, yaitu pendidikan dengan bentuk bangunan serta pendapatan dengan material. Dengan demikian, pada posisi ini hipotesis dapat diterima
Kata Kunci: Co-working space, identity of community, place identity
References
Alessia, U. S. A. I. (2019). How creative professionals reshape the historic city. The perspective of architects as managers of coworking spaces in Villanova district, Cagliari city. Territorial Identity and Development, 4(1), 35-49.
Bacevice, P., Spreitzer, G., Hendricks, H. & Davis, D. (2019). How coworking spaces affect employees’ professional identities. Harvard Business Review.
Baim, C. (2013). Mindful Coworking: Be Confident, Happy and Productive in Your Working Relationships. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Edwards, R. & Usher, R. (2007). Globalisation & pedagogy: Space, place and identity. Routledge.
Ernawati, J. (2014). Hubungan aspek residensial dengan place identity dalam skala urban. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Technology. 1(1). 21-32
Esthi, R. B. & Ekhsan, M. (2020). The Effect of Miillennial Intrinsic Value toward Employee Outcomes with Employee Benefit as Mediating Variable for Strengthening Indonesia’s Startup Business. Solid State Technology, 63(2s), pp.8856-8871
Gandrum, D. N. (2018). Pelan Place Identity Dalam Menciptakan Community Resilience di Wilayah Urban Fringe. Jurnal Arsitektur ZONASI, 1(2), 77-86.
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6), 821-842.
Gomez, K., Mawhinney, T. & Betts, K. (2022). Welcome to Generation Z.
Groat, L. & Wang, D. (2002). Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley. New York
Hauge, A. L. (2007). Identity and place: a critical comparison of three identity theories. Architectural science review, 50(1)
Hinchman, L. P. & Hinchman, S. (Eds.). (1997). Memory, identity, community: The idea of narrative in the human sciences. Sunny Press.
Howell, T. (2022). Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda. Research Policy, 51(2) 104447.
Jevremovic, P., Basic, M. & Juranovic, M. (2012). Aesthetic of Industrial Architecture in the Context of Industrial Buildings Conversion. International Symposium
Kartika, D.I., Setijanti, P. & Septanti, D. (2019). Co-Working Space Design Preferences Factors at Surabaya User of Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering Research and Advanced Technology-IJERAT (ISSN: 2454-6135), 5(2), 13-19
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Inforrmasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Bergabung #1000StartupDigital, https://1000startupdigital.id/, diakses pada 16 Desember 2021
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Mencari startup yang #GoTheExtraMiles, https://startupstudio.id, diakses pada 16 Desember 2021
Kerlinger, F. N. & Howard, B. Lee. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research. 4th Edition. Florida: Harcourt Inc.
Khairunnisa, C. I. & Anggraini, L. D. (2020). Minat Generasi Muda Terhadap Co-working Space di Kota Blitar. Seminar Nasional Envisi 2020: Industri Kreatif
Kingma, S. (2019). New ways of working (NWW): work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Culture and Organization, 25(5), 383-406
Kojo, I. & Nenonen, S. (2016). Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland-what and how? Facilities
Kopec, D. (2018). Environmental psychology for design. Bloosbury Publihing USA
Kwiatkowsi & Buczynski. (2017). Ultimate Coworking Lauch Sequence How to Build a Successful Coworking Communtiy, paperback
Lang, J. & Moleski, W. (2010). Functionalism Revisited: Architectural Theory & Practice & the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge
Larasati, A. C. P. & Meirinawati, M. (2020). Manajemen Strategi Sentra Kreatif dan Teknologi Melalui Inovasi CAK eMUS dalam KORIDOR Coworking Space Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Publika, 8(5).
Lintang, L. R. (2019). Perancangan Interior Koridor Coworking Space Surabaya. Disertasi Doctoral Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta
Lucas, R. (2016). Research methods for architecture. Hachette UK
MIKTI. (2021). Mapping & Database Startup Indonesia 2021.
Mubarsyah, L. R. (2021). Pemkot Surabaya Akan Bangun Co-working untuk Kembangkan Sartup, https://jawapos.com/surabaya/, diakses pada 2 Desember 2021
Nabila, M. (2019). Mengulis Bisnis “Coworking Space†Agar Menguntungkan, https://dailysociial.id/, diakses pada 8 Januari 2023
Puddifoot, J. E. (1995). Dimensions of community identity. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 5(5), 357-370
Purwanto, E. & Harani, A. R. (2020). Understanding the place attachment and place identity in public space through the ability of community mental map. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 402, No. 1. P.012024. IOP Publishing
Putri, H. S. & Satiawan, P. R. (2019). Penentuan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Lokasi Coworking Space di Kota Surabaya. Jurrnal Teknik ITS, Vol. 8, No. 2
Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture Architecture & Design. Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc. Chicago.
Rodrigues, R. & Rituerto, M. D. (2021). Socio-economic impact assessments for new and emerging technologies. Journal of Responsible Technology.
Sentika, S., Yunizar, Y. & Muizu, W. O. Z. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Mengenai Startup Terhadap Pilihan Berkaring di Bidang Startup Melalui Motivasi Pada Mahasiswa Generasi Y dan Generasi Z di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 4(3), 188-201.
Shemirani, S. M. M. & Hodjati, V. (2013). Explanation to “Identity of Place†Model and Investigation of its Effective Factors. American Journal of Scientific Research, (86), 91-100.
Spence, K. C. (2017). A Primer on Theory in Architecture. Taylor & Francis.
Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of business and technical communication, 26 (4), 399-441
Spinuzzi, C., Bodrosic, Z., Scaratti, G., & Ivaldi, S. (2019). “Coworking is about communityâ€; but what is “community†in coworking? Journal of Business and Technical Communicatiion, 33(2), 112-140
Stedman R. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, pp. 34, 561-581
Sutriadi, R. & Fachryza, D. M. (2021). A phenomenon in urban disruption: the emergency of Coworking Spaces in Bandung. Heliyon, 7(7), e07663.
Torabi, Z. & Brahman, S. (2013). Effective factors in shaping the identity of architecture. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 15(1), 106-113.
Tremblay, D. G. & Scaillerez, A. (2020). Coworking Spaces: New places for business initiatives? Journal of Innovation Economics Management, (1), 39-67.
Twigger-Ross, C. L. & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and Identity Processes. Journal of Environment Psychology, 16, 205-220.
Waters-Lych, J., Potts, J., Butcher, T., Dodson, J., & Hurley, J. (2016). Coworking: A transdisciplinary overview. Available at SSRN 2712217.
Weijs-Perree, M., van de Koevering, J., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2019). Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 534-548
