RE-EVALUATING USER MOTIVATION IN USING ARCHITECTURAL SOFTWARE IN EACH DESIGN PHASE IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v6i3.1051Keywords:
Architectural Stage, Design Media, User MotivationAbstract
Abstract: Digitalized era has caused design software to develop so rapidly. As a result, architects and designers are offered various choices of design software to choose from, and sometimes designers use different software on different design phases. However, the motivation of choosing a specific software in specific phases is still unknown. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the frequencies of certain architectural software usage in different design phases, along with the user's motivation in choosing the software. Qualitative method with grounded theory approach are used in the study. Data is then analysed with directed content analysis extracted from software external and internal quality in ISO/IEC 25010:2011. The result of this study reveals that in earlier (exploratory) design phases, media with high efficiency (such as SketchUp) are preferred, and later phases show a significant increase in the need for precision. Efficiency and output suitability are highly valued in architectural visualisation and presentation needs.
Abstrak: Era digitalisasi telah menyebabkan software desain berkembang sangat pesat. Akibatnya, arsitek dan desainer disuguhkan dengan berbagai pilihan software desain dan seringkali desainer menggunakan software yang berbeda pada setiap fase desain. Namun, alasan memilih software tertentu dalam fase tertentu masih belum jelas diketahui. Oleh karena itu, makalah ini bertujuan untuk meneliti frekuensi penggunaan software arsitektur dalam fase desain yang berbeda, sekaligus alasan pengguna dalam memilih software tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan grounded theory. Data yang didapat dianalisis dengan directed content analysis dari ISO/IEC 25010:2011. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa pada fase desain awal (eksplorasi), media dengan efisiensi tinggi lebih disukai. Sedangkan fase akhir menunjukkan peningkatan yang signifikan terhadap kebutuhan kepresisian. Efisiensi dan kesesuaian outputjuga sangat dicari dalam fase visualisasi dan presentasi arsitektur.References
Abanyie SA, B. E. (2015). The Impact of Computer Aided Architectural Design Tools on Architectural Design Education. The Case of KNUST. Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 04(02), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/21689717.1000145
Agirachman, F. A., Putra, I. F., & Angkawijaya, A. (2018). Initial Study on Building Information Modeling Adoption Urgency for Architecture Engineering and Construction Industry in Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 147(January). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814706002
Arisman, A. (2018). Hubungan antara Penggunaan Software Pemodelan Arsitektur dengan Kompleksitas Bangunan. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, Volume 7(2), pp. 68–73. https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.7.2.68
Bouchlaghem, D., Shang, H., Whyte, J., & Ganah, A. (2005). Visualisation in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC). Automation in Construction, Volume 14(3), pp. 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.012
Carmona-Medeiro, E., Antequera-Barroso, J.A., Domingo, J.M. (2021). Future Teachers' Perception Of The Usefulness Of Sketchup For Understanding The Space And Geometry Domain. Heliyon, Volume 7(10).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08206
Cresswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd edition. Sage Publications, USA.
El-gammal, Y., (2008). Visualization in Architecture Education. Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector, December 2008. ISBN : 2010003810
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, Volume 15(9), pp. 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Indraprastha, A. (2020). Encouraging Computational Skills: Evaluating BIM Course to Support Design Studio. 192(EduARCHsia 2019), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.200214.030
McHugh, M. L. (2013). The Chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, Volume 23(2), pp. 143. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018
Miguel, J. P., Mauricio, D., & RodrÃguez, G. D. (2014). A Review of Software Quality Models for the Evaluation of Software Products. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, Volume 5(6), pp. 31–53. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2014.5603
Putra, R. A. (2018). Peran Teknologi Digital dalam Perkembangan Dunia Perancangan Arsitektur. Elkawnie, 4(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.22373/ekw.v4i1.2959
Tang, H., & Wang, C. X. (2013). Discussing Sketchup software in the application of architectural design teaching. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 48(2), 1319–1323. doi: 10.1109/ICISE.2010.5689844
Telaga, A. S. (2018). A review of BIM (Building Information Modeling) implementation in Indonesia construction industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 352(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/352/1/012030
Wilis, F. A., Kusuma, H. E., & Indraprastha, A. (2016). Kecenderungan Penggunaan Software Pemodelan dalam Proses Desain Terkait Alasan dan Usia Pengguna. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI, 1.
