ASPEK FASAD BANGUNAN CAGAR BUDAYA YANG MEMPENGARUHI MINAT MASYARAKAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v6i3.1047Keywords:
Building Facade, Public Interest, Cultural Heritage BuildingAbstract
Abstract: The facade of teh building can affect the public interest in activities around the building. A good building facade can influence people to dare to pass or even stop around the building. Tunjungan as a cultural heritage area, has experienced a phase of lost space which caused a decrease in the intensity of activities on Jalan Tunjungan due to the nonactive frontage. It the importance to understand the facade of the building that is of interest to the community so that the cultural heritage area can develop properly. This study aims to determine the aspects of the facade of cultural heritage buildings that affect the attractiveness and interest of the community in the Tunjungan area. This research uses qualitative phenomenological methods through interview tactics, distributing questionnaires to participants, and observation at the site. This study shows that the aspects that influence people's interest in activities on Jalan Tunjungan are building openings, building shapes, building decorations, building colors and building materials. Facades that attract public interest must maintain uniqueness, aesthetics and classic style to be a community attraction.
Abstrak: Bentuk fasad bangunan dapat mempengaruhi ketertarikan masyarakat untuk beraktivitas di sekitar bangunan. Fasad bangunan yang baik dapat mempengaruhi masyarakat untuk berani melintas atau bahkan berhenti di lingkungan sekitar bangunan. Tunjungan sebagai kawasan cagar budaya pernah mengalami fase kawasan lost space yang menyebabkan turunnya intensitas kegiatan di Jalan Tunjungan akibat adanya fasad bangunan yang tidak aktif. Pentingnya pemahaman mengenai fasad bangunan yang diminati oleh masyarakat agar kawasan cagar budaya dapat berkembang dengan baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui aspek fasad bangunan cagar budaya yang mempengaruhi daya tarik serta minat masyarakat di Kawasan Tunjungan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif fenomenologi melalui taktik wawancara dan penyebaran kuesioner terhadap partisipan serta pengamatan langsung pada lokasi penelitian. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aspek yang mempengaruhi minat masyarakat untuk beraktivitas di Jalan Tunjungan adalah bukaan bangunan, bentuk bangunan, dekorasi bangunan, warna bangunan dan material bangunan. Fasad yang menarik minat masyarakat harus mempertahankan keunikan, estetika dan gaya klasik sehingga dapat menjadi daya tarik bagi masyarakat. Selain itu penjagaan warna dan material bangunan asli juga menjadi daya tarik tersendiri bagi masyarakat.References
Alyari, M. (2018). Role of environmental psychology in strategic development of urban public spaces based on aesthetic needs of citizens. Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health. https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.com/journal-5---urban-visual-perception.html
Arnheim, R., & Biddle, M. D. (1977). The Dynamics of Architectural Form. University of California Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=QrHtrH6k07EC
Briney, A. (2020). What Is Environmental Determinism. https://www.thoughtco.com/environmental-determinism-and-geography-1434499
Brown, G., & Gifford, R. (2001). Architects Predict Lay Evaluations of Large Contemporary Buildings: Whose Conceptual Properties? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0176
Ching, F. D. K. (2015). Architecture Form, Space, and Order (4th edition). In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Dyer, H., & Ngui, M. (2014). Watch This Space. Designing, Defending and Sharing Public Spaces.
Imamoglu, Ç. (2000). Complexity, Liking and Familiarity: Architecture and Non-Architecture Turkish Students’ Assessments of Traditional and Modern House Facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155
Jalali, A., Utaberta, N., & Che-Ani, A. I. (2013). The Effect of Architectural and Urban Elements On City Image in Lahijan’s Historical Area, Iran. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.913.964&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Kalaga, W. (2010). Face/Façade: The Visual and The Ethical. Town Planning and Architecture, 34(3), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.3846/tpa.2010.12
Krier, R. (1991). Architectural Composition. Academy Editions.
Krisetya, A. T., & Navastara, A. M. (2018). Identifikasi Karakteristik Fisik Koridor Jalan Tunjungan sebagai Ruang Publik. 7(2).
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. In College English (Vol. 53, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/378107
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=%5C_phRPWsSpAgC
Motalebi, G. H. (2002). Environmental Psychology: The New Knowledge-Based Discipline At Architecture And Urban Design’s Service. (10), 52–67. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=40349
Moughtin, C., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (1999). Urban Design: Ornament and Decoration. Architectural Press.
Mutfianti, R. D., Teknik, F., Arsitektur, J., Kartika, U. W., Sutorejo, J., & Utara, P. (2013). Mengembalikan Spirit of Place , Sebuah Upaya mempertahankan Citra Koridor Jalan Tunjungan Surabaya. I(1), 23–32.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible Space; Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. Macmillan. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=%5C_r%5C_SAAAAIAAJ
Nugraha, & Robby. (1998). Koridor Komersial Bersejarah Tunjungan-Surabaya.
Parsaee, M., Parva, M., & Karimi, B. (2015). Space and place concepts analysis based on semiology approach in residential architecture: The case study of traditional city of Bushehr, Iran. 11(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.07.001
Poerbantanoe, B. (1999a). The Lost-City dan Lost-Space Karena Perkembangan Pengembangan Tata-Ruang Kota Kasus : Koridor Komersial Jalan Tunjungan , Kotamadya Surabaya. 27(2), 31–39.
Poerbantanoe, B. (1999b). The Lost-City Dan Lost-Space Karena Perkembangan Pengembangan Tata-Ruang Kota Kasus : Koridor Komersial Jalan Tunjungan , Kotamadya Surabaya. 27(2), 31–39.
Pramesti, P. U., Prabowo, B. N., & Hasan, M. I. (2019). Kajian Ruang Dan Aktivitas Pasar Minggu Taman Setiabudi Banyumanik Terhadap Terbentuknya Kohesi Sosial Masyarakat. 19(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.19.2.2019.122-130
Rapoport, A. (1977). Human Aspects of Urban Form Towards a Man—Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. Essays on Planning Theory and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-021223-4.50020-7
Rawlings, L. A. (2015). Understanding the Environmental Contexts of Boys and Young Men of Color. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/understanding-environmental-contexts-boys-and-young-men-color
Sadeghifar, M., Pazhouhanfar, M., & Farrokhzad, M. (2019). An exploration of the relationships between urban building façade visual elements and people’s preferences in the city of Gorgan, Iran. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15(6), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2018.1548340
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. E. Arnold. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=M9SLfxpkscgC
Tucker, C., Ostwald, M. J., Chalup, S., & Marshall, J. (2001). Sustaining residential social space : a visual and spatial analysis of the nearly urban. 40th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association ANZAScA, 366–373. http://anzasca.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ANZAScA2006_Chris-Tucker_Michael-J-Ostwald_et_al.pdf
Utaberta, N., Jalali, A., Johar, S., & Surat, M. (2012). Building Facade Study in Lahijan City, Iran: The Impact of Facade’s Visual Elements on Historical Image. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(7), 1839–1844.
