KONDISI DAN RESPON MASYARAKAT PADA RUANG TERBUKA PUBLIK DI SURABAYA SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v6i3.1045Keywords:
Pandemic, Public Open Space, Urban ParkAbstract
Abstract: Public open spaces used for social interaction, recreation, and economics are now experiencing a crisis. The spread of the COVID-19 pandemic since the end of 2019 has caused various problems in public spaces. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method to determine how the community responds to public open spaces during a pandemic. A questionnaire survey by google form was conducted because of the social restrictions. And 84 respondents participated in this study. The data were analyzed descriptively, which consisted of analyzing, describing, and summarizing. And the results show that the park condition in Surabaya during the pandemic objectively and subjectively changed related to the arrangement of parks in Surabaya, which became cleaner and neater. The community also responded that the park's current condition was quite good, but the park closure made people feel bored and start visiting the park. So activities in the park that were initially spread throughout the park area now became centered on the park's edge. It emphasizes that parks are important to increase the quality of community, and improving public open space services that refer to the public needs during the COVID-19 pandemic is also needed.
Abstrak: Ruang terbuka publik yang digunakan masyarakat untuk berinteraksi sosial, rekreasi dan nilai ekonomi kini mengalami krisis yang belum pernah terjadi sebelumnya. Penyebaran pandemi COVID-19 yang telah terjadi sejak akhir 2019 menyebabkan berbagai permasalahan pada ruang publik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif untuk mengetahui bagaimana respon masyarakat terkait ruang terbuka publik saat pandemi. Pengambilan data dengan kuesioner dengan google form dilakukan akibat pembatasan sosial yang berlaku. Dan sebanyak 84 responden berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Data kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif yang terdiri dari menganalisis, menggambarkan dan meringkas kondisi situasi. Hasil yang didapat menunjukkan bahwa kondisi Taman di Surabaya saat pandemi secara objektif dan subjektif menunjukkan perubahan terkait penataan Taman di Surabaya yang pada saat pandemi menjadi semakin bersih dan rapi. Masyarakat juga merespon bahwa kondisi Taman saat ini sudah cukup baik, namun tutupnya Taman membuat orang menjadi jenuh dan mulai berkunjung ke Taman. Sehingga aktivitas di Taman yang awalnya tersebar di seluruh area Taman kini menjadi berpusat di pinggir Taman. Hal tersebut menekankan bahwa pentingnya Taman dalam meningkatkan kualitas masyarakat, dan peningkatan pelayanan ruang terbuka publik yang mengacu pada kebutuhan masyarakat saat pandemi COVID-19 juga dibutuhkan.References
Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. American journal of preventive medicine, 28(2), 159-168.
Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space: Cambridge University Press.
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban planning, 68(1), 129-138.
Clarke, R. (2008). Improving street lighting to reduce crime in residential areas: Citeseer.
Cowan, R., Hill, D., & Campbell, K. (2005). Start with the park: Creating sustainable urban green spaces in areas of housing growth and renewal: Cabe Space.
Fadila, K., & Fernanda, M. (2010). Understanding public space concepts as key elements of sustainability urban design. In Lehmann (Stefeffen) et al. (Ed.) Sustainable architecture and urban development, CSAAR Press (Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region), Volume II/4, pp. 229-244.
Fahmi, Y., & E., E. (2021, 20 Oktober 2021). Hore, Taman Bungkul Surabaya Kembali Dibuka Sebentar Lagi. Liputan 6. Retrieved from https://surabaya.liputan6.com/read/4688857/hore-taman-bungkul-surabaya-kembali-dibuka-sebentar-lagi
Gehl, J. (2007). Public spaces for a changing public life. Open space: People space, 2, 3-11.
Gehl, J. (2011). “Three Types of Outdoor Activities,â€â€œLife Between Buildings,†and “Outdoor Activities and the Quality of Outdoor Spaceâ€: from Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (1987). In The City Reader (pp. 586-608): Routledge.
Hilman, Y. A. (2015). Revitalisasi Konsep Alun–Alun sebagai Ruang Publik:(Studi pada pemanfaatan alun alun Ponorogo). ARISTO, 3(1), 28-37.
Imanda, R. (2016). Strategi Peningkatan Quality of Urban Life (QoUL) dengan Pertimbangan Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat terhadap Kota Tempat Tinggal. Temu Ilmiah Iplbi, 193–200. In.
Jurecka, A., Skucińska, P., & Gądek, A. (2021). Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Pandemic on Physical Activity, Mental Health and Quality of Life in Professional Athletes—A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9423.
Lang, J. (2006). Urban design: A typology of procedures and products: Routledge.
Lotfi, S., & Solaimani, K. (2009). An assessment of Urban Quality of Life by Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach (Case study: Comparative Study of Quality of Life in the North of Iran). Journal of Social Sciences, 5. doi:10.3844/jssp.2009.123.133
Malek, N. A., Mariapan, M., Shariff, M. K. M., & Aziz, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of green open spaces: A review.
Marans, R. (2014). Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future linkage opportunities. Habitat International, 45. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.019
Mubasyirin, C. (2020, 31 Juli 2020). Komunitas BISA, Meraup Rejeki di Tengah Pandemi. Suara Surabaya. Retrieved from https://www.suarasurabaya.net/cityguide/2020/komunitas-bisa-meraup-rejeki-di-tengah-pandemi/
Nasution, A. D., & Zahrah, W. (2014). Community perception on public open space and quality of life in Medan, Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 585-594.
Nations, U. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. In.
Parra-SaldÃvar, A., Abades, S., Celis-Diez, J. L., & Gelcich, S. (2020). Exploring perceived well-being from urban parks: Insights from a megacity in Latin America. Sustainability, 12(18), 7586.
Purnamasari, A. (2012). Kajian Spasial Ruang Publik (Public Space) Perkotaan Untuk Aktivitas Demonstrasi Mahasiswa di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 1(2).
RI, B., Lt, G. N. I., & Subroto, J. J. G. (2020). Implikasi hukum pembatasan sosial berskala besar terkait pencegahan Covid-19.
Seaman, P. J., Jones, R., & Ellaway, A. (2010). It's not just about the park, it's about integration too: why people choose to use or not use urban greenspaces. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(1), 1-9.
Slater, S. J., Christiana, R. W., & Gustat, J. (2020). Peer Reviewed: Recommendations for keeping parks and green space accessible for mental and physical health during COVID-19 and other pandemics. Preventing chronic disease, 17.
Smith, T., Nelischer, M., & Perkins, N. (1997). Quality of an urban community: a framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban planning, 39(2-3), 229-241.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Penerbit CV. Alfabeta.
Winarna, W., Bawole, P., & Hadilinatih, B. (2021). Redefinisi ruang publik di masa pandemi COVID-19 studi kasus di kota Yogyakarta. Vitruvian: Jurnal Arsitektur Bangunan dan Lingkungan, 237-256.
Zhang, W., & Lawson, G. (2009). Meeting and greeting: Activities in public outdoor spaces outside high-density urban residential communities. URBAN DESIGN International, 14(4), 207-214. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.19. doi:10.1057/udi.2009.19
